Tushar Masand Air India as Act Triggers Outrage Faces Controversy
On April 9, 2025, Air India flight AI2336 from Delhi to Bangkok became the center of a shocking controversy that has left the airline industry reeling. A 24-year-old passenger, Tushar Masand, allegedly urinated on a fellow traveler, Hiroshi Yoshizane, the managing director of Bridgestone India, during the flight’s descent, prompting swift action from the airline and widespread public criticism. This disturbing incident, now dubbed “Pee-gate 2.0,” has reignited debates about passenger behavior, airline protocols, and the challenges of maintaining decorum at 30,000 feet.
The episode unfolded in the business class cabin, where Masand, reportedly intoxicated after consuming two glasses of single malt, committed the offensive act. Air India promptly placed him on a 30-day no-fly list, reported the matter to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), and launched an internal investigation to determine further consequences. As news of the incident spread, it drew comparisons to similar events in Air India’s recent history, raising questions about how such disruptions continue to occur.
What Happened on Flight AI2336
According to reports, the incident took place as the Airbus A320 prepared to land in Bangkok. Masand, seated in 2D, allegedly stood up and urinated on Yoshizane, who was in seat 1D, causing immediate distress in the cabin. Another passenger, identified only as Matthew and seated in 1F, voiced strong objections, citing safety and hygiene concerns, and demanded Masand’s removal from the business class section.
The cabin crew, led by senior members Sunpreet Singh and Rishika Matre, responded quickly, providing towels to Yoshizane and escorting him to the lavatory to change. Masand was relocated to an economy seat, 14C, and issued a verbal warning, while the captain informed ground staff in Bangkok. Despite the severity of the act, Yoshizane declined to file a formal complaint, stating he did not wish to waste time upon landing, though Masand reportedly apologized repeatedly.
Air India’s Response and Regulatory Oversight
Air India acted decisively, confirming the incident as “unruly passenger behavior” and emphasizing that its crew followed all standard operating procedures. The airline offered to assist Yoshizane in pursuing a grievance with Bangkok authorities, an offer he declined, but it has not hesitated to penalize Masand with an interim flying ban. An independent committee has been tasked with reviewing the case, and its findings could lead to a longer prohibition, potentially extending to other Indian airlines if the DGCA intervenes.
Also Read: Hope fades – Zomato COO rinshul chandra steps down in 2025
The DGCA, India’s aviation regulator, is now considering stricter measures, including a possible year-long ban and fines for Masand, to deter such conduct. Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu Kinjarapu expressed concern, stating that the ministry takes such incidents seriously and will work with Air India to ensure accountability. This response reflects growing frustration with repeated cases of mid-air misconduct, particularly on Air India flights.
A Troubling Pattern for Air India
This is not the first time Air India has faced scrutiny over passenger behavior. In November 2022, a drunken passenger urinated on a 72-year-old woman on a New York-Delhi flight, sparking national outrage and leading to fines and a pilot suspension. Just weeks later, another incident occurred on a Paris-Delhi route, and in June 2023, a passenger was detained for defecating and urinating on a Mumbai-Delhi flight. These recurring episodes have cast a shadow over the Tata Group-owned airline, which is striving to rebuild its reputation.
Critics argue that these incidents highlight gaps in how airlines manage alcohol consumption and enforce passenger conduct. Despite updates to protocols following the 2022 “peegate,” questions remain about whether enough is being done to prevent such behavior, especially in premium cabins where expectations for comfort and professionalism are high. For Air India, the timing is particularly unfortunate as it seeks to regain trust under new ownership.
Public Reaction and Industry Impact
The incident has triggered a firestorm of reactions online, with many expressing shock and embarrassment over the damage to India’s aviation image. Social media platforms are abuzz with calls for harsher penalties, including lifetime bans for offenders like Masand, and stricter rules on in-flight alcohol service. Others have sympathized with Yoshizane, praising his restraint in not escalating the matter legally despite the humiliation.
Also Read: Empowering Relief Income Driven Repayment Student Loans Soar
For the aviation industry, this episode underscores the need for better training and preventive measures to handle unruly passengers. Airlines worldwide are now under pressure to balance hospitality with vigilance, ensuring that a few individuals do not tarnish the travel experience for others. In India, where air travel is booming, such incidents could prompt regulators to tighten guidelines, potentially affecting how airlines operate.
What Lies Ahead
As Air India awaits the outcome of its internal probe, the DGCA’s investigation will likely shape the broader response. If found guilty, Masand could face not only an extended ban but also financial penalties, setting a precedent for how India addresses disruptive behavior in the skies. Meanwhile, Air India is working to contain the fallout, emphasizing its commitment to passenger safety and regulatory compliance.
Also Read: Bold Delhi draft EV Policy 2.0 Unveiled to Slash Pollution
For passengers, this incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of civility during air travel. While the skies connect people across borders, they also demand respect and responsibility, qualities that were notably absent on flight AI2336. As the story unfolds, all eyes are on Air India and the DGCA to deliver justice and restore confidence in Indian aviation.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What did Tushar Masand do on Air India flight AI2336?
Tushar Masand allegedly urinated on Hiroshi Yoshizane, a fellow passenger, during the descent of a Delhi-Bangkok flight, causing distress in the business class cabin.
How did Air India respond to the incident?
Air India relocated Masand, issued a verbal warning, placed him on a 30-day no-fly list, and reported the matter to the DGCA for further investigation.
Why didn’t Hiroshi Yoshizane file a complaint?
Yoshizane declined to pursue a formal complaint, stating he did not want to waste time after landing in Bangkok, though he accepted Masand’s apologies.
Could Tushar Masand face a longer ban?
Yes, the DGCA is considering a year-long flying ban and fines, pending the findings of Air India’s independent committee and its own investigation.
Has Air India faced similar incidents before?
Yes, Air India dealt with urination incidents in 2022 on New York-Delhi and Paris-Delhi flights, and a defecation case in 2023 on a Mumbai-Delhi route.
What is the DGCA doing about this case?
The DGCA is reviewing the incident and may ask all Indian airlines to ban Masand, while also exploring stricter rules to prevent future unruly behavior.